While 633 KB sounds tiny compared to a 4K movie, for web images, it is oversized. Industry experts generally recommend the following benchmarks:
If your blog's content area is only 800 pixels wide, there is no reason to upload a 4000-pixel-wide image.
These can go up to 300-400 KB , but only if they are central to the design.
Here is a blog post concept and draft focusing on why this specific size matters and how to handle it.
If your total page weight is 2 MB, a single 633 KB image takes up nearly 30% of your entire data budget for that page. The Result: Slower rankings and fewer visitors. 2. Why 633 KB is "Large" for a Blog
While 633 KB sounds tiny compared to a 4K movie, for web images, it is oversized. Industry experts generally recommend the following benchmarks:
If your blog's content area is only 800 pixels wide, there is no reason to upload a 4000-pixel-wide image.
These can go up to 300-400 KB , but only if they are central to the design.
Here is a blog post concept and draft focusing on why this specific size matters and how to handle it.
If your total page weight is 2 MB, a single 633 KB image takes up nearly 30% of your entire data budget for that page. The Result: Slower rankings and fewer visitors. 2. Why 633 KB is "Large" for a Blog
